FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
|
Date: |
September 24, 2009 |
|
Contact: |
Patty Charnas, Manager of Environmental Programs
Department of Community Development |
|
Phone: |
360-337-4558 |
|
Email: |
pcharnas@co.kitsap.wa.us |
| No: |
09-52 |
County to file motion for reconsideration on critical areas
decision
(Port Orchard, WA) –
On September
9, 2009, the state Court of Appeals ruled that the Kitsap County must use
its Shoreline Management Program, adopted under the state Shoreline
Management Act (SMA), to regulate critical areas within 200 feet of
shorelines according to the Shoreline Management Program and not use the
Critical Areas Ordinance, adopted under the state Growth Management Act
(GMA). This decision is the first to be handed down after the recent Supreme
Court decision in Futurewise v. Western Washington Growth Management Board.
Although the Court of Appeals relied on Futurewise, it acknowledges that no
opinion in Futurewise garnered a majority vote and that a split among the
justices leaves the issue of critical area regulation by the SMA or the GMA
unclear.
Given that ambiguity, the Kitsap
Board of County Commissioners has decided to file a motion for
reconsideration on or by September 29, 2009. “The split decision by the
Supreme Court created some confusion. It is our hope that reconsideration by
the appeals court will provide clearer direction to counties,” said Charlotte Garrido, Chair of the County’s Board of Commissioners. The effect of the
filing delays the issuance of the mandate from the Court of Appeals, which
has not yet been issued. The issuance of a mandate is necessary before the
Court of Appeals’ decision can become effective. The County’s Department of
Community Development will continue to process permits using current
Critical Areas Ordinance provisions until the Court of Appeals issues a
ruling on the motion for reconsideration.
###
|